Lesson 1: Evaluating Information and Media Literacy
You will learn a simple credibility framework that helps you judge online information for accuracy, bias, and evidence. You will practice with a guided example, then evaluate a real source that matters to you.
Estimated time: 60 to 90 minutes. You can complete the lesson in one sitting, or pause and return later.
Quick Start
- Pick a topic you care about: health, work, money, consumer choices, or community news.
- Complete Parts 1 to 3 to learn and practice the framework.
- Take the quick self-check for instant feedback, then submit your Part 4 evaluation.
- After submitting, move directly into Lesson 2 to practice with low-stakes scenarios.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:
- Identify key indicators of digital source credibility.
- Distinguish between fact, opinion, bias, and misinformation.
- Apply a structured framework to evaluate an online source.
- Use one verification step before acting or sharing.
- Explain how media influence can shape decision-making.
Part 1: Real-World Activation
Choose one decision area that feels relevant today. Good options include health guidance, job advice, consumer products, or community news. This lesson helps you slow down and evaluate before you act or share information.
Pick one topic
Choose one: health, employment, finance, consumer purchases, or community issues. If you are unsure, pick the topic you see most often online.
Part 2: Learn the Credibility Framework
Use this four-part framework to evaluate credibility quickly and consistently. If you only remember one thing, remember this: look for evidence you can verify.
1) Authority
Who created the content, and what makes them qualified to speak on the topic?
2) Evidence
What proof is provided, and can you verify the claims through reliable sources?
3) Bias and Purpose
What is the goal of the content, and who benefits if you believe it?
4) Currency
When was it created or updated, and does the timing affect accuracy?
Vocabulary supports
Bias: A tendency to present information in a way that favors a viewpoint or outcome.
Misinformation: Inaccurate information shared without intent to harm, but still misleading.
Disinformation: Inaccurate information shared intentionally to manipulate or deceive.
Credibility: The extent to which a source is trustworthy, accurate, and supported by evidence.
Quick Practice Check: Test the Framework
Complete this short self-check for instant feedback before moving to guided practice. You may retake it as needed.
Part 3: Guided Practice
Practice the framework with a sample source. If you do not have one ready, use a short post you recently saw online. This practice is not graded. It prepares you for the task and sets you up for Lesson 2 practice scenarios.
- Pick a sample source. Use an article, post, or screenshot.
- Write the claim. One sentence describing what the source says is true.
- Use the four checks. Authority, Evidence, Bias and Purpose, Currency.
- Rate credibility. High, Medium, or Low with a brief reason.
Part 4: Independent Application Task
Evaluate a real online source you choose. Pick a topic that matters to your life. Your goal is to show clear reasoning using the credibility framework.
Choose one submission format
Written (250 to 400 words), Audio (2 to 3 minutes), or Visual infographic (one page with captions).
- Source details: Title, author or organization, and date if available.
- Claim: One sentence describing what the source says is true.
- Framework: Authority, Evidence, Bias and Purpose, Currency.
- Rating: High, Medium, or Low with a brief justification.
- Verification step: One step you would take before acting or sharing.
Submit Your Source Evaluation
Use the form below to submit your evaluation. If you are submitting audio or a visual, paste a share link in the form.
Part 5: Reflection (Preview)
You will complete the full reflection on the Reflection page. Use these prompts now as a preview, then bring your best ideas with you.
- How might this framework change what you trust online, and why?
- What is one habit you will change when you see a persuasive headline or viral post?
- Where in your life do credibility checks matter most right now?
Supports
Use these supports anytime you need them. They are here to reduce barriers while keeping the goal clear.
Choose what helps you
Use vocabulary help, break work into short segments, and choose the submission format that fits your strengths.
- Writing support: Use sentence starters and short paragraphs, or switch to audio.
- Attention support: Work in 10-minute blocks and save your notes to return later.
- Language support: Focus on clear reasoning and key ideas rather than perfect grammar.
- Technology support: If bandwidth is limited, use a short source or a screenshot.
- Confidence support: There is no “perfect source,” only clear evaluation.
Rubric Snapshot
You are evaluated on reasoning and evidence. You are not graded on choosing a “right” source. You are graded on how clearly you apply the framework and justify your credibility rating.
- Framework use: You address all four checks clearly.
- Evidence and verification: You identify evidence and propose a realistic verification step.
- Bias awareness: You explain purpose and potential bias without guessing.
- Clarity: Your reasoning is organized and understandable.
- Real-world connection: You connect the skill to adult decision-making.
Next Step: Lesson 2 – Practice Lab
15 to 25 minutesLesson 2 helps you build confidence by practicing the same credibility checks with short, realistic scenarios. You will work with low-stakes examples (health, work, and finance) and strengthen your ability to explain why a source is credible.